The Saskatoon Photography Club holds fall & wintercompetitions, Photo Presentation and a Year End Competitions (Traditional Colour, Monochrome, Altered Reality & Portrait). These are judged by professional photographers from our community. Comments and scores are given to the submissions.
Submission Guidelines
Submissions are due on or before the submission date. Instructions will be available on the website and at meetings.
Do not resize your digital image, we prefer full resolution
The minimum resolution is 1280 x 800
Prints are only considered for Year End Competitions
Entrants must be the author of any image/s and all parts thereof submitted into a Competition.
All parts of the image or images must have been ‘photographed’ by the author.
‘Content-aware Fill’ or similar modification that is entirely based on pixels in the original image/s and which does not extend the image beyond its original boundaries is ‘acceptable’.
‘Generative Fill’ or other processes that use content generated by software from written prompts or developed from the work of others is ‘not acceptable’.
Summer Fun Competition
Entries must be taken during the scheduled summer fun trips
A portrait competition challenges photographers to capture the essence, personality, and expression of a subject, whether human or animal, in a manner that reveals character and emotion. Entries should focus on the subject’s face or body, emphasizing elements like lighting, composition, and mood. Creative use of backgrounds, poses, and props is encouraged, but the subject must remain the focal point. Post-processing should enhance the natural qualities of the portrait without over-manipulation, unless specified by the competition.
How is your Photograph Judged?
The purpose of the competition is to provide instruction through constructive critical comment and evaluation. Images are judged by 3 professional photographers.
Judges comment using 3 categories:
Pictorial or Artistic Merit (IMPACT)
Technical Skill
Interpretation of Subject
Pictorial or Artistic Merit (IMPACT)
This is a measure of the SUCCESS of the COMPOSITION.
Factors include the “RULES OF COMPOSITION”:
Rule of Thirds
Balance
Lighting
Framing
Tonal Range and Texture
Pattern and Rhythm
Lead-in Lines
Technical
Here you measure the skills of:
Exposure
Depth of Field
Focus
Shutter Speed
Filters
Panning
Mounting, spotting (prints)
Interpretation
Here you evaluate how well the photographer interpreted the topic photographically.
Is the subject matter appropriate?
Has it been chosen carefully?
Has it been captured in an interesting way?
Does the subject communicate itself clearly without distraction?
Note: a TITLE may or may not assist in this process. It is only one factor to be considered.
(some titles are merely labels, and are therefore neutral).
Image Evaluation
10. Outstanding, flawless 9. Dramatic, beautiful, strong impact 8. Excellent, minor flaws only, photographic mastery 7. Very good, just short of excellent 6. Competent, technically OK, lacking impact 5. Average, unmemorable, lots of room for improvement 4. Below standard, one or more specific faults 3. Many faults, badly composed 2. Unacceptable, slide or print should not have been entered.
Awarding Points
A 30 point system of judging will be used
Each of the 3 judges will award up to 10 points in each of the following categories:
pictorial or artistic merit (impact),
technical skill, and
interpretation of the topic.
All points are totaled and divided by 3, giving a maximum of 30.
Judges will vote to break ties
What does the total scoring reflect?
30/30 Unique; outstanding; stunning; flawless (rarely awarded) 27/30 Outstanding; dramatic; beautiful; technically superb; very strong impact 24/30 Excellent’ worthy of Honorable Mention – minor flaws only. Demonstrates photography mastery; a memorable picture. 21/30 Very good, but falls short of excellent rating. 18/30 Good. Competent: technically satisfactory, but lacking in impact, interest, strength of composition, etc. 15/30 Average, undistinguished; unmemorable. Shows minor faults. Lots of room for improvement in composition, interpretation, etc. 12/30 Below standard; lacking in some essential quality or definable way. One or more specific faults which really spoon the picture
Guide for Judging Presentations
Judges are asked to evaluate and score the presentation in each of the following categories:
Introduction & Ending
• How effective the opening and closing slide are in terms of titles, maps, graphics, etc. • How well they lead into the main theme and how well they close out the set at the end • Transitional slides within the set, if used, should also be considered here
Sequencing
Mixing of styles
Order and timing of images on the screen
Appropriate select of images for illustrating the topic
How well they interpret the theme
Photography
The quality of the images in terms of:
Composition
Artistic merit
Impact
Technical quality:
How well the photographer has used his/her equipment
Focus
Exposure
Depth of field
Lighting
Slide cleanliness and lack of projection problems are also important
Audio Presentation
If commentary is included, consider the narrative style including:
Choice of words
Smoothness of presentation
Intonation (expression, delivery, clarity of voice)
Unity of thought
Evaluate choice of music and sound effects if used
Overall Impact
Evaluate the set as a whole
Each category is judged out of 10 which gives you a grand total out of 50.